document #88
NSI Topology Representation extension
| Status: | closed | Start date: | 06/21/2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | Richard Hughes-Jones | % Done: | 0% |
|
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| Document Type: | Proposed Recommendation |
Description
This is the NSI Topology Representation extension of NML. This should accompany the NSI CS v2 document.
History
Updated by Greg Newby over 9 years ago
- Status changed from submitted to initial review
- Assignee set to Richard Hughes-Jones
Thanks for this submission. We'll review it in the next standards council telecon, prior to 60-day public comment.
Updated by Greg Newby over 9 years ago
- Status changed from initial review to AD review
Updated by Jeroen van der Ham about 9 years ago
I understand that feedback was provided for the main NSI document, could I get feedback for this one also?
Updated by Alan Sill about 9 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to High
The NSI group is meeting in 4 sessions at OGF 39. Can we get the AD input completed in time to be used at this meeting, please?
Updated by Jeroen van der Ham about 9 years ago
Unfortunately I will not be at OGF39, but I will meet with the NSI group later this month. So please relay comments through Guy Roberts.
Updated by Greg Newby almost 9 years ago
- Priority changed from High to Normal
Update from the AD: this is still being worked on by the authors
Updated by Richard Hughes-Jones almost 9 years ago
- Status changed from AD review to author action
Updated by Greg Newby over 8 years ago
Update from the standards telecon July 8: The group is working on this document, and hoping to have progress in August 2014.
Updated by Guy Roberts almost 8 years ago
After review by the NSI working group significant gaps were found in this document. In particular there has been considerable debate in the WG around the nature of STPid syntax. As a consequence, we have been re-defining this. A consensus was reached at the NSI meeting in September in Uppsala on the STP issue and this is now being written up by the group.
For this reason, document 88 is now considered obsolete and should be removed. A new version of the document will be submitted soon.
Updated by Greg Newby almost 8 years ago
- Status changed from author action to closed
(Other formats not available in this archive.