Operations » Editor

Thanks for this, John-Paul. I have completed the initial review, and this document seems to be in order.

Prior to 60-day public comment, we should receive an Area Director review.
- Greg

Apologies for the delay with initial AD review of this document. We will try to get it done within the next few weeks.

Per the standards council telecon of January 11, this is now approved for 60-day public comment. OGF is working on a email server migration, which we will complete before announcing public comment.

Once it is announced, the WG and community members should be asked to read & review the document.

Standards council noted that the header for section 14 says, "Intellectual Attributes Statement," but it is the standard OGF boilerplate "Intellectual Property Statement." While the document does have discussion of intellectual attributes, it is preferable that the section label follow the OGF standard of "Intellectual Property Statement."

Dear authors/editors: The tracker wasn't updated yet, to reflect current status, so I am doing this now.

My understanding from today's standards council telecon is that all comments were provided by email in October/November 2019, and that the working group has had a phone call to discuss next steps.

These next steps, basically, are for the WG to submit a final document that incorporates needed changes due to public comment (including the late-arriving comments mentioned above).

Please feel free to check with me, or with Jens (who is acting as your Area Director for this purpose), as needed.

Thanks. Greg