document #181
Implicit alignment of model group
| Status: | closed | Start date: | 09/26/2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | Michael Beckerle | % Done: | 100% |
|
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| Document Type: | Proposed Recommendation |
Description
Alignment - for model group, should implicit alignment be greatest of the alignments of children, or least common multiple?
Use of 'greatest' may be a holdover from some earlier version of the spec where alignment values were constrained to be powers of 2. In that case greatest is guaranteed to be the same as least-common-multiple.
There is no such constraint on the value of the alignment property, so taking greatest alignment of the children is not conservative. It can result in incorrect alignment.
History
Updated by Steve Hanson about 8 years ago
- Status changed from public comment to closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
See http://redmine.ogf.org/boards/15/topics/45
Erratum 4.6 created. GWD.207 updated.
(Other formats not available in this archive.