document #180
Request clarifications of the Escape Scheme processing
| Status: | closed | Start date: | 09/26/2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | Steve Hanson | % Done: | 100% |
|
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| Document Type: | Proposed Recommendation |
Description
Does any character effectively escape the block start or is the block start inside the data a syntax error (is a valid escape block start only one that appears at the beginning of the data?).
Does an end block have to be followed by the delimiter (optionally padding first) or does the absence of a delimiter mean that it is not an end block?
Without an escape block start are the escape escape characters still interpreted.
Does extra escape characters require escape kind = escapeCharacter.
What is the appropriate behavior for the following:
Assuming escapeBlockStart="Start", escapeBlockEnd="END", escapeEscapeCharacter="!"
,4StartStart1!!23END4!ENDEND, ( comma is delimiter)
History
Updated by Steve Hanson about 8 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from public comment to closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
See http://redmine.ogf.org/boards/15/topics/42
Erratum 4.5 created. GWD.207 updated
(Other formats not available in this archive.