This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum Redmine content management system saved from host redmine.ogf.org file /boards/15/topics/56?r=394 at Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:41:10 GMT Term "unordered group" should be "unordered sequence" - Public Comments Archive - Open Grid Forum

Forums » #117 - DFDL v1.0 Revision »

Term "unordered group" should be "unordered sequence"

Added by Michael Beckerle about 9 years ago

Spec says: The occurrences of members of a sequence group with dfdl:sequenceKind=’unordered’ (hereafter referred to as an ‘unordered group’) may appear in the data in any order.

We make this mistake a lot, that is, slip into using group when we mean sequence.

Suggest 'unordered group' be replaced by 'unordered sequence' uniformly everywhere.


Replies (4)

Resolved: Term "unordered group" should be "unordered sequence" - Added by Steve Hanson over 8 years ago

Updated erratum 3.28 in experience document 1.

DONE - RE: Term "unordered group" should be "unordered sequence" - Added by Michael Beckerle over 8 years ago

Change in draft-gwdrp-dfdl-v1.0.4-r06.docx

(1-4/4)

This is a static archive of the previous Open Grid Forum Redmine content management system saved from host redmine.ogf.org file /boards/15/topics/56?r=394 at Thu, 03 Nov 2022 15:41:10 GMT