document #309

Correct simple element zero length matching for nil

Added by Steve Hanson almost 3 years ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:closed Start date:05/10/2016
Priority:Normal Due date:
Assignee:- % Done:

0%

Category:-
Target version:DFDL v1.0
Document Type:Proposed Recommendation

Description

Section 9.3.2.1 says
If the result is length zero as described above, the representation is then established by checking,
in order for:
1. nil representation (if %ES; is a literal nil value).
...
But bullet 1 should be:
1. nil representation (if either %ES; or %WSP; on its own* is a literal nil value).

History

Updated by Michael Beckerle over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from submitted to accepted
  • Target version set to DFDL v1.0

Last line of above description should say:

1. nil representation (if either %ES; or %WSP*; on its own is a literal nil value).

Updated by Michael Beckerle over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from accepted to final review

Updated by Michael Beckerle over 1 year ago

Erratum 5.32

Updated by Michael Beckerle about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from final review to closed

Also available in: Atom PDF