---------------------------------------------------------------------- GFS-WG #2 Wednesday, June 29, 2005 4pm to 5:30pm 11 participants Note taker: Osamu Tatebe (AIST) Agenda ------ RNS Specification Review (45 min) Architecture Discussion (45 min) Meeting ------- * RNS Specification Review 1.1.2 Junctions Q: Type of 'EPR', 'LogicalReference' and 'TargetPath' are all 'String'. How to mandate the syntax of the content? A: RNS does not mandate the syntax or format for value of each QName. 1.1.2.3 Referral Junction C: Referral Junction can be broken. Need to add a note in the document. 1.1.3.2 Entry Name Restriction D: Section 1.1.3.2.1 is based on special characters in Unix, Windows, and Posix. To enable a number of systems to access RNS, it is a union of special characters in each system. Q: How about 8.3 name implementation? A: The 8.3 filename limitation does not affect the RNS namespace, even for implementations that refer to 8.3 constrained filesystems. Path name delimitation characters strive to avoid conflict with existing filesystem conventions, however the RNS namespace is independent of the target filesystem (when RNS is providing namespace services to for filesystems) limitations. Q: Do 255 characters in length in Section 1.1.3.2.3 mean 255 bytes or 255 unicode characters? A: 255 unicode characters. It is for each entry name between '/' and '/' not for an entire path name. That should be enough. 1.2.2.2.1 Required Entry Properties D: Why is 'TargetPath' specified by 'Absolute path'? An absolute path can span several RNSs. Instead, 'relative path' is good enough since an alias entry points to an entry within the service. This issue needs to be discussed further. 1.3.2.1 create C: 'Exact one type (LogicalReference, EPR, ...' below the table should be 'Exact one type (LogicalReference, Junction, ...'. The whole Q: Do you have a use case other than GFS? A: No. We need a use case other than GFS. C: Andre Merzky can provide such a use case. He will send a few paragraphs. Legend ------ Q: Question A: Answer C: Comment D: Discussion